I’m sure no one can have failed to notice the report from Unicef which puts Britain at the bottom of a league of childhood well-being in 21 developed countries. If the authors of the report are to be believed, being a kid in Britain is a pretty unpleasant experience, and really, that isn’t surprising.
This generation of children start school at the age of four, a year earlier than their parents, and this will usually have been preceded by at least a year in a pre-school nursery environment - any parent who doesn’t enrol their offspring in such an establishment is considered to be a bit of an odd ball. Thirty years ago they would have been the norm. Of course, nursery care is a necessity. Not because it is best for the child, but because the majority of mothers are now in full time employment - two incomes are vital for most families - and these women are being encouraged to return to work earlier and earlier in a country which has the longest working hours in Europe. Gone are the days when a woman would give up work for a few years to have a family. Now, she will return within weeks of the birth, usually reluctantly. A study in 1999 showed that only 4% of new mothers actually wanted to work full time, 43% would, in an ideal world, have preferred to become full time mothers.
The life of a working mother is not an easy one when you consider it involves doing two full time jobs, only one of which you are paid for. It means constant early morning dashes to your child care provider, a race across town to your desk, a full days work, a dash back to the child care provider, then home. It doesn’t stop there. There is a meal to cook, laundry to do, housework, babies to bath, homework help, oh, and if you are very lucky you might even get to talk to the father of your offspring. The latter is not always possible because usually by the time you have both finished with the evening routine, you are so exhausted that you fall asleep in front of the tv. Then in the morning you crawl out of bed and do it all again.
Now, you may be wondering what all this has to do with the happiness and well-being of children. Quite a lot actually. I have a friend who works as a health visitor, her over-riding ethos is that happy mothers tend to have happy children and she makes a huge effort to provide support to the mothers she works with. It makes sense. Children look to their parents for reassurance, if they see them constantly stressed, tired and worried it causes them to feel the same. We have a generation who are growing up with parents who feel just this way, all the time, and this isn’t just a problem in the short term, it creates a horribly negative impression of adult life. What child would look forward to becoming an adult if they believe it is all about spending your life on an endless treadmill.
Since this report was published, I have seen a number of people using the old ‘blame the parents’ chestnut. No, let’s not. Let’s blame a society which makes life bloody hard for parents. This has never been a child friendly country, but at least in the past children were only expected to be seen and not heard. Nowadays, it seems they are expected to be non-existent. Children are viewed as an inconvenience, a problem to be dealt with, the product of a ‘lifestyle’ choice, instead of human beings who are adults in the making. When it snowed last week, I actually heard some employers saying that if people didn’t go into work they would be sacked. The fact that many schools were closed, which meant a large number of children were staying at home and needed to be cared for, did not seem to register with these people. It would be a rare parent indeed who would put someone else’s profits before the safety and well-being of their children, yet, some considered it acceptable to demand that they did just that.
The sad thing is, we do not need to live like this. The Scandinavian countries which top the league also have a high percentage of two income families, yet they don’t experience these problems. For them flexi-time is a normal working pattern, not just a luxury enjoyed by those lucky enough to have forward thinking employers. Many Scandinavian parents are able to plan their working hours so that their children are always cared for by one parent or the other, and even if external care is needed it is high quality and easily available, not over-subscribed and over-priced.
I could continue and discuss the lack of affordable housing - in many families one parent’s income is completely swallowed by housing costs. I could talk about the absence of playgrounds - sold off to the developers of luxury homes. Maybe, I could mention an education system that constantly changes and which places pressure on pupils from the time they are in infant school. However, I will just sum up by saying this: we need to have a long, hard look at the way we live. The children of today will be the adults of tomorrow, and the kind of adults they become will be largely dependent on their experiences now. For the last twenty or thirty years we have lived in a ‘me, me, me’ society, and it just hasn’t worked. The good old fashioned childhood may not have been as idyllic as many of us remember it to be, but it did have it’s advantages. Children were allowed to be children, they weren't regarded as inconvenient little packages which get in the way of profit, and becoming a parent wasn’t considered to be a lifestyle choice.
4 comments:
I'm not certain I agree with you Kate. i still blame the parents.
if you choose to have kids its a responsibilty not a right.
My parents gave up things to bring me up properly! They never expected people to make accomodations for their choices.
Pete, I knew you would disagree ;-)
I agree, parenthood is a responsibility, and it's one the vast majority of parents take very seriously, regardless of what the media tell you. The stories you hear about the hoody brigade are not typical. I don't know anyone who has children like that, my own certainly aren't, but I have been a stay at home mum for 9 years so I'm there when they come home from school and can keep very close tabs on them. But, I'm lucky, most mothers can't afford to give up work.
I also agree that no one should have to accommodate someone elses children, that is not the point I was making.
My parents gave up things to bring me up too, that's what parents do. But, I'm guessing that as a toddler you weren't dragged out of bed at 6am, washed, dressed and fed by a mother who could barely keep her eyes open, then driven to an over-crowded and under-staffed day nursery, where you would stay for 11+ hours a day, being cared for by impersonal and ever changing staff, so that your Mum could earn enough to pay the family mortgage. I know I wasn't and my family were pretty typical. Things were generally cheaper in those days, and if women worked they tended to have part time jobs which weren't essential to the family budget.
I'm a few years younger than you and I can remember the change Thatcherism brought about, it bisected my childhood. Within a few years of that government being elected everything changed. House prices and mortgage rates went through the roof, women (my own mother included) were forced to go out to work to keep a roof over their family's head. That was unprecedented. In fact, the only time so many women had been working full time prior to this was during WW2 when men were away fighting. Even in the 80's, house prices were low enough that most people took out a mortgage for 3x their annual salary, now the average is 5 or 6x.
I'm also not saying that parents should be given special treatment. You have flexi-time in your job. That should become commonplace. Proper child care should be available, not the baby storage facilities which exist now - and trust me that is what the affordable places are like, I know, I was a working mother for many years.
The truth is children need their parents, and young children need their mothers in particular. Most mothers do not want to leave their children with strangers. When we were children they didn't have to.
It's not just the issue of working parents. Schools have changed somewhat since you and I attended. Now, kids are tested, and assessed from the day they arrive. School league tables are all important, if a school gets a bad rating it will affect the number of new applicants, which in turn will affect the school budget. Nowadays, teachers aren't there to educate, they are there to push the school up the league table, and if that means applying pressure to pupils who have no aptitude for a subject, so be it. Personally, I was useless at maths and sciences, but that wasn't a problem, my teachers encouraged me to succeed at the subjects I was good at. If I was at school now I would be constantly harangued to do better at maths, do better at science, because if I didn't I would be letting the school down.
My youngest son has been particularly affected by this. He has a talent for maths and science (ironically) and works at a level several years above his actual age. Because of this he has been continually pressured into doing better and better. I don't mind his teachers encouraging him, but when they are reminding him that the status of the school (we live in a village, it's very small) rests on his shoulders, I do get very angry. He is a kid, his biggest problem should be whether to play football or rugby, he shouldn't have to worry about school budgets.
What I would like to see is an end to the get rich quick, self-centred, instant gratification society we now live in. I would like to see people stay within travelling distance of their extended family, so if a mother needs to work, her children can be cared for by grandparents (as I was). I would like to see a return to a culture of respect for parents, instead of a culture which alternately blames them for the ills of all children yet removes ever more responsibility from them - do you know many social workers now regard a stern telling off and a grounding as emotional abuse?
Let's face it, the kids growing up now will be looking after us in our old age and we have a choice between a generation which is stressed out and self-centred and one which is caring and community minded. I know which I'd prefer.
I'm guessing we will have to agree to differ on this, but, seriously, unless a family are pretty wealthy producing future tax payers is a considerably more difficult than it ever was in the past.
hello from Canada,
I agree with you, Kate. My wife and I feel it is very important to invest quality time in our children. It is not easy, as I am finishing my univeristy degree while she says home with the children.
To us, the finiacial debt is worth the risk. I do acknowledge that the cost of living is not nearly as high as you have to endure. We are fortunate to have several social programs to help in our situation.
I have one question for you. Why did your cost of living in the UK go up so much during the Thatcher area?
They needed an official servey for this to be known? The message has been that if you do not work and your parents are not rich then you are a no one.
Result we all worship the Great God Mammon who sucks the life from his worshipers and priests.
On estates adults go hungry to get the biggest TV and sound system they can.
Get it on spec, HP, terms, credit. Make sure you have the most expesive Nikes for your kids and the most channles from sky so that they can tell you what to watch.
Trust me I live here. I see it every day.
We have a culture of chavs and the status of any given drop out is that you have the brightest cleanest trainers, the most gold chains and the most expensive sports ware.
"We do you work for that which does not satisfy and strive for that which does not sustain?"
Only the strongest minds have been able to resist the onslaught of the message from the priests of gold.
Parents, grandparents, children and babes - your only value is the expensive items you own...
But the truth is this - he who dies with the most toys still dies.
Post a Comment